We have a new project process in which projects need to be approved in a separate team before they can move on to become actual projects in our New Product Development team. We have had the issue of members not following this process and trying to create the project themselves before approval in the previous stage.
Is there a way to restrict members from creating new projects within a team?
Welcome, @Melanie_Joseph,
I don’t think so.
But you could create a dashboard/reporting chart or saved search report, and then a recurring task to check that weekly, perhaps.
Thanks,
Larry
When managing projects, teams often choose between using a dedicated project management tool like Asana or relying on the flexibility of a spreadsheet. Each option offers distinct advantages, but a crucial difference lies in how freely users can create and manage projects. This flexibility—or lack thereof—can significantly impact how effectively a tool is used across an organizatio’.
Spreadsheets: ultimate flexibility, with risks
Spreadsheets are incredibly versatile, allowing users to create project plans, timelines, budgets, and more with complete freedom. Anyone with access can design a new project layout, customize workflows, and manipulate data to suit their specific needs. This unrestricted nature makes spreadsheets a go-to tool for quick project setup and personal task management.
However, this same flexibility can lead to a lack of consistency and potential chaos. Without standardized approaches, organizations often end up with numerous poorly constructed, redundant, or overly complex spreadsheets. These issues can make project tracking difficult, increase the likelihood of errors, and create challenges in maintaining alignment across teams. While spreadsheets offer freedom, they demand a high level of discipline and expertise to avoid turning that freedom into a liability.
Asana: structured, but lacking fine-grained control
Asana, in contrast, is designed to bring structure and organization to project management. It offers standardized workflows, predefined templates, and robust features for tracking progress, assigning tasks, and collaborating within teams. These features are intended to reduce the administrative burden of project management and maintain consistency across projects.
However, Asana’s structure comes with a significant limitation: it does not provide the ability to restrict who can create projects. In Asana, all users with access to the platform are generally free to start new projects, regardless of their role or the organization’s overall project management strategy. This can be problematic for companies that need tighter control over project creation to maintain quality, consistency, and alignment with organizational goals.
The inability to enforce restrictions on project creation means that organizations using Asana must rely on policies and trust that users will follow best practices. But without the necessary tools to enforce these policies within the platform, there’s a risk of ending up with a fragmented project landscape similar to what you might see with poorly managed spreadsheets.
The need for fine-grained administrative control
Organizations often require fine-grained control over who can create, modify, and manage projects to ensure that project management aligns with company policies and standards. In larger organizations, this control is crucial to prevent project proliferation, maintain data integrity, and ensure that all projects contribute effectively to the company’s goals.
While spreadsheets naturally allow for unrestricted project creation, they can also be easily controlled by limiting access to files or establishing clear guidelines on their use. Asana, however, does not currently offer such granular administrative controls. This limitation can be a significant drawback for companies that want to allow some users the freedom to create and manage projects while restricting others to maintain order and consistency.
Balancing flexibility and control
For organizations seeking both flexibility and control, Asana’s lack of project creation restrictions poses a challenge. Companies may need to develop additional processes outside of Asana to manage who can create projects, such as implementing manual approval workflows or routine checks. Both involve extra workload.
Setting clear guidelines and providing training within the organization to ensure that even with unrestricted project creation users follow a standardized approach may seem a solution. But these rely heavily on user cooperation and do not fully address the need for built-in control mechanisms.
This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.