Hi everyone!
I’m looking for advice on how teams document their recurring workflows in Asana. We have several processes that repeat monthly (content calendars, reporting, client onboarding) and I want to make sure our team follows consistent steps each time.
Currently, we’re using a mix of:
- Project templates (which are great!)
- Task descriptions with step-by-step instructions
- Comments on template tasks explaining the “why” behind each step
What approaches have worked well for your team? Do you use:
- Detailed task descriptions with checklists?
- Separate SOP documents linked in tasks?
- Project briefs with process documentation?
- Something else entirely?
Would love to hear what’s working for other teams. Thanks in advance for any tips!
Hi @Taylor_Brooks , thank you for the post!
I love your approach, and I already see a lot of great practices. This makes me wonder if there is anything you are already noticing not working as expected?
Here’s a setup I’ve seen work really well:
1. Make the brief your source of truth
- Put the “why,” scope, definitions, and success criteria in the Project Brief in the Overview tab
- Link out to a formal SOP if you have one, but keep the high-level context in Asana so it travels with the work
2. Put the “how” in task templates
- Create one task template per stage or role
- Use a checklist in the description for step-by-step instructions
- Add dependencies so people get work in the right order
- Pre-fill custom fields like Stage, Owner, Effort
3. Automate the handoffs
- Rules to auto-assign when Stage changes, add followers, set due dates from start date, and move tasks to the next section when dependencies are complete
- If you kick off via a form, map form answers into fields, so templates stay consistent
4. Choose the right repeat pattern
- For monthly programs: duplicate a “Master” project template with relative due dates
- For simple repeating items: use a recurring task, and link back to the SOP in the description
5. Keep comments for decisions, not instructions
- Put durable steps in the template description
- Use comments to capture exceptions, decisions, and learnings
- Roll good learnings back into the template monthly, so it stays current
6. Add light governance
- Version your templates in the brief (v1.3, last updated date, owner)
- Optional “Process Health” custom field to flag blockers for a quick retro
Thanks Joanna. The brief-as-source-of-truth idea is good, we haven’t committed to that yet. Our SOPs live in a separate doc so there’s always a gap.
To your question about what’s not working: keeping templates current. Someone finds a better way, mentions it in a comment, but it never gets rolled back into the template. Next person gets the old version. Your monthly review idea is exactly the fix.