🏷 Tips on naming your custom task types

If you’re not up to speed with custom task types, make sure to discover what they can do for your workflows! Within that linked post, there is a tip I wanted to surface here; which is how best to name your task type!

As I’ve began working with customers that are discovering the wonders of using task types, I’ve noticed that they are naming them similar to their status fields, particularly, including the word “status” within their task type name which isn’t really ideal. Why?

Here’s a few checkpoints to make sure you’re naming your task types correctly:

1. Name it after an object - answer the question “what type of task is this?”
Existing examples within Asana are the ‘native types’ such as ‘Task’, ‘Milestone’, ‘Approval’. So it makes sense to follow along those lines, such as a To-do, Lead, Client, Quote, Proposal, Contract, Invoice, Expense, Post, Campaign, Bug, Applicant, Vendor, Order, Property etc.

2. Name it in the singular - it should be ‘a’ thing, not many things
Instead of naming it ‘Bugs’, just name it ‘Bug’

3. Don’t include the word ‘status’ or similar terms like stage or phase
Instead of naming it ‘Request status’ or worse ‘Request statuses’, just name it ‘Request’

4. Can’t think of a name?
If you’re stuck on what to name your task type, a clue may lie with the name of your project, especially if it is an ongoing process. If your project is called ‘Creative requests’, your task type should be called ‘Creative request’ (in the singular! :sweat_smile: ).

5. Does the task type name look right?
Once you go to the Customize/Workflow button → Project settings and set your task type as the default, or via the Task types and templates menu, like this…

…make sure that it looks correct and reads well in the UI, which will now display your task type name in various surfaces:


Richard Sather

Asana Solutions Partner & Forum Leader
:rocket: See all of our top tips & tricks on our website.

3 Likes

Good post!

Not that I at all disagree, but maybe you can say a bit about why you make this recommendation?

Thanks, @Phil_Seeman. I thought the reason was already implied in point 1. no? :sweat_smile:

Nice post, @Richard_Sather, which should help folks to orient to this newer feature.

Thanks,

Larry

1 Like

Great piece!

1 Like