Hi,
The API object Project
seems to be missing the created_by
field. I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t have it. The doc does not list it, but shows one in the example. Is that expected behavior?
I am also surprised a team or a goal doesn’t have that field…
@Phil_Seeman do you have any insights about this situation?
Hmm, interesting. Internally created_by
is based on a field that we apply to more or less all objects, so perhaps we just didn’t expose this?
By any chance have you tried using opt_fields to “opt in” or specify that you’d like to see this field? It might be possible we are not returning it by default.
@Matt_Bramlage @Bastien_Siebman I tried getting it with opt_fields
but no dice, still not returned.
Thanks for trying. I am guessing this won’t be too hard for the API team, maybe a perfect first assignment for a new hire data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c539a/c539a04238e836ec1ad669640c7dca8ba2eccc99" alt=":grimacing: :grimacing:"
@Bastien_Siebman and @Phil_Seeman – thanks for your feedback on this. I’ve reported this to our API team, and it’s on their radar for a future update
.
I believe Goals should already have created_by
in the response when making the GET /goals/{goal_gid}
call with opt_fields
. If you see otherwise, please keep me posted.
2 Likes
Hi,
@AndrewWong is it still on the roadmap? Thanks
@AndrewWong sorry to bother, you never answered my question back in January.
@AndrewWong it has been almost a year with no answer, are you receiving those notifications?
1 Like
Hey @Bastien_Siebman, sorry for the radio silence on this topic. We’ve followed up with the API team on this request and it’s still not on the roadmap. I will reiterate that developers want this field exposed. To that end, can you share anything about your use case and/or the value that this field will provide? This context helps in the prioritization process.
1 Like