This is the only point I disagree with. We use ācopy linkā all the time in other, non-integrated software. But Iād love to have the ātagā icon back where it was because I use it all the time
Agreed - this is very counter-intuitive for us, the description section can sometimes get long as we add a lot of info in here like brief details or specs.
Please move the project buttons back up to the top. I hate scrolling through long descriptions to find it (every single task sent in from email has a description long enough to push the project off the screen). Iām wasting precious time finding this over and over each day. Overall I like the other changes but I canāt say that they are saving me any of the time I now waste b/c the project field is buried.
Hi @Matt_Eggers! One good workaround is to use the āTab+Pā shortcut to automatically get to the āProjectā field without having to scroll through the task description. Hope this helps!
Hello,
I think your recent Task layout update is a step backwards (see images below). I see no reason why āMark Completeā button should have label (the check mark is pretty obvious by itself) and why the asignee and due date is moved from the header to additional separate row within task body, leaving plenty of whitespace in the header. Itās just inefficeint use of space moving all the task details and conversations downwards in the view. Additionally, moving project tags below description separates metadata by the content (description) - this is counter-productive if a description is longer than one line and there are custom fields blockā¦
Just wanted to add my voice that I also have been finding the projects under the description is counterintuitive. The Asana hierarchy is workspace ā team ā project ā task. Itās fairly clear which workspace and team youāre in (although to be honest, the recent changes make workspace less clear), but itās really critical to know which project and section a task is in. It gives the task context, especially if you might have similarly named tasks in other projects or sections. Surely new users need this as much as experienced users?
And in response to the explanations regarding helping new users - my suggestion would be to have a toggle in the settings that turns the labels on or off (Assignee, Due Date, Complete Task). Default it to On for new users, have a way for people to turn it off.
Or, play the user guide video by default for new users.
Or, a more detailed āguided tourā overlay for new users.
Because youāre not going to add labels to every little thing, are you?
Improving onboarding is great, Iām sure many of us commenting have teammates, colleagues or clients we want to pick up Asana quickly and easily - but hopefully Asana could reconsider the importance of seeing the project and section āat-a-glanceā for all users.
Why!? In the Task right pane please please put the Project tab back up under the Task title where it belongs.
Thanks for your feedback. I assumeādue to the excellent power of Asana and your inherent need to have an interest in Asana working wellāthat your own Asana teams are also using Asana to track who does what in the building and upkeep of Asana.
- Am I correct in my assumption Asana teams use Asana internally to track their own work?
- If so, how has the Asana staff dealt with the much-discussed issue of projects being below the description line?
I get that you have to go with developing towards what the data tells you, but if you all are assigning anything to projects, I have a hard time believing that your teams would like this change either, and therefore probably are figuring out ways around it, just like we users have been here.
If your teams are using Asana internally, you would presumably have the longest-running and most experience using Asana, and have the most interest in making it work correctly for you, since your jobs and job satisfaction rely on that. Whereas we Asana users can (disappointedly) choose to switch to a lesser-platform if need be, you all at Asana canāt really switch. You need to make it work for your team, if Iām correct in that you are using it. So, that said, Iād you have workarounds for this, or CSS your team is using to correct it, please share.
The suggested workaround of Tab-P has never worked consistently for me, even before I was using CSS to style Asana back closer to the old UI, and especially now with the CSS Iām using, the Tab-P shortcut doesnāt work at all.
Even at the times Tab-P did sometimes work for me, I found it to be a rather useless shortcut, in that it only letās you jump to the first project field. Ifāas is almost always the case in my work flowāa task is associated with at least one project, and needs to be added to a second or third project, as well, then Tab-P (sometimes) would let me jump to the project field, but Iād then have to use my trackpad/mouse to click on the plus sign anyway to add it to an additional project, instead of Tab-P always working to always let me add to a project (whether there already was an associated project or not). Since the shortcut description says āadd to project,ā Iād assume it would always let me do exactly that: add to a project without using my mouse. But it does not do that, even when it is working.
So other workarounds would be welcome. As would fixing the Tab-P to work by actually adding to an additional project (not highlighting the first associated project). As would fixing the UI in the next update to have the project back at the top, anywhere above the description field.
Thanks!
@Susanna, not to detract from the topic here, which I agree with and have voted for, but to maybe help with the TAB+P issue: After hitting TAB+P hit tab again for those tasks that are already assigned to a project. Itāll take you to the āadd another projectā field.
Respectfully, the problem with Asana saying āuse TAB+P and TAB+Tā to a mouse-user is that itās trying to force change of a strong habit, with no clear gain for the annoyance it causes.
Also, Iāve been using TAB+P for a while and still havenāt figured out how to change the section without using my mouseā¦ is this possible?
@Evaldas_Micius, thank you for taking the time for making this comparison. It makes it very clear what is wrong with the new layout. I can ad 2 more problems: the yellow bar, saying: āThis task is visible to its collaboratorsā or āThis task is private to members of this projectā (which make the task layout even more longer) and adding tags is now behind the 3 dots (so also counter-productive).
@Marie, can you send this picture to the development team? Maybe it helps Asana to better understand why so many users have problems with the new UI. Thank you!
@Donna_B, thank you for your contribution! You put it all very clear!
@Marie and @Kaitie, could you please send this comment to your development team. @Donna_B makes it very clear why so many users want to go back to the old UI. Thank you!
When the task is long by sending from email, I have to scroll down to select section which is next to project name
. This is a bad design.
There are a lot of discussions going on about the new design. @Marie can probably merge your post with the others.
Thanks for the mention @Bastien_Siebman, and thanks for sharing your feedback @Dean_Le. iāve just merged it with the main thread to centralise all feedbacks!
+1 to all comments above. Come on Asanaā¦itās OK to say āoopsā¦we screwed this one upā. The comments above indicate that the user base doesnāt just need to get used to a few changesā¦theyāve lost productivity based on the recent interface changes. They feel the productivity lost by the change is so bad that some of them have even started engineering changes via styles to try and regain the productivity.
I mean seriouslyā¦a āLikeā button (something to make us feel good?) is more important than tagging a task (something productive thatās now on a dropdown menu)ā¦this isnāt friggen Facebook.
@Marie and @Kaitie, thanks for coming into the conversation. It had gone quiet for too long.
I also appreciate that Asana provides this community, which provides the ability to discuss the product with Asana and other users.
Iāve gone through the topic and collected some data, for anyone that is interested. I submit that it clearly demonstrates this change is something that Asana should be seriously reconsidering.
Stats on this topic:
- Age of topic: almost 2 months
- Votes: 91
- Only ties it for 13th most votes, but it got there in less than 2 months.
- Most votes ever received. 205.
- Replies: 155
- 2nd most replies ever.
- Most being 176. And it took a year for it to get to 155 replies.
- Users: 74
- New Users: 30
- People appear to feel strongly enough about this change, that they are joining the community to look for answers and ask for help.
- (Is Asana still pushing this update out to additional users? People continue to join the community to post to this topic. And people are still posting they just got changed over.)
- Users that stated they speak for their organization: 18
- Likes: 745
- Number of topics that were merged into this one: 8
I canāt think of another topic that got this kind of attention in this short a time. If you were looking for feedback to this change, you clearly got it.
But what to reconsider? People have different concerns about this change, and some have shared positive feedback with some of the changes. Looking through the comments, Iāve distilled it down to what the complaints are and how many users complained.
- Projects below the description: 52
- Tags below the description: 22
- The yellow visibility warning: 12
- Completed button: 11
- Assignee field: 9
- Due Date field: 7
- Everything: 7
- Inefficient use of space: 5
- The new buttons: 5
Iām going to add my voice here that putting tags and projects below the description feels backwards to my teamās workflow. If this change is supported by data, Iām curious to know how that data was gathered. And, why not consider this thread part of the data which supports keeping things how they were?
May I recommend adding an option for this so users can choose? I already love the Asana āhacksā provided in my user profile. Would love to be able to choose the order of info on the task pane - that way I can display info the way that best suites my needs, and others can do the same.
So are we done with A/B testing? I still hate the new layout after month of using. Please give me the old UI back. I wonder whatās the point of having community voiced out but decision are still made based on data
Do you have any thoughts on Monday? Iāve been looking for an unbiased review since they started advertising everywhere. It seemed visually appealing but fairly shallow as an organization tool. And the pricing structure was not great. But I also wasnāt able to give it a thorough test.